The #SaveYourInternet fight against Article 17 [ex Art. 13] continues🔒 SSL Verified

Table of Contents

• ↓ Skip links
• ↓ Article 17 [ex Art. 13]  only benefits big businesses
• ↓ What’s at Stake?
• ↓ #1 Making Platform primarily liable leads to filtering, even when filtering is not mentioned
• ↓ #2 This affects much more than YouTube and Facebook…which already comply with Article 17 [ex Art. 13]
• ↓ #3 Article 17 [ex Art. 13] results in the outsourcing of legal judgments
• ↓ Top Alternatives to saveyourinternet.eu

6-Month Traffic Trend Estimate

Official Contact & Profiles

Visual representation extracted from saveyourinternet.eu

Content Snippets from saveyourinternet.eu

"The Council APPROVED the Copyright Directive: How Did EU Member States Vote?"

"On 15 April the Council (= EU Member States) APPROVED the copyright Directive at the Ministerial level at an Agriculture and Fisheries Council meeting in Luxembourg – see the overview below of how EU Member States voted."

"See the joint statement from Finland, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland and the separate statements from Estonia and Germany here."

"Article 17 (ex Art. 13) of the adopted text will force upload filters onto the Internet. The EU Member States will now have 2 years’ time to implement the Directive into their own national legislation. The fight continues, but now at national level. This copyright legislation is a Directive, which means that the EU Member States have some margin for manoeuvre at the national level with regards to how they ensure that the legislation will work in practice. Therefore, it will be important to convince national policymakers to ensure that they implement Article 17 (ex Art. 13) in the least harmful way, by ensuring the best possible protection of citizens’ fundamental rights."

Key Topics & Focus Areas for saveyourinternet.eu:

Skip links

Article 17 [ex Art. 13]  only benefits big businesses

What’s at Stake?

#1 Making Platform primarily liable leads to filtering, even when filtering is not mentioned

#2 This affects much more than YouTube and Facebook…which already comply with Article 17 [ex Art. 13]

#3 Article 17 [ex Art. 13] results in the outsourcing of legal judgments