Pgaction Domain Overview🔒 SSL Verified

Live Data Status: Analyzed on September 5, 2026|News & Media

Welcome to the detailed analysis for pgaction.org. This domain is officially recognized as Parliamentarians for Global Action - Mobilizing Legislators as Champions for Human Rights, Democracy and a Sustainable World.. According to their official web presence, their primary focus is: "Parliamentarians for Global Action (PGA) - Mobilizing Legislators as Champions for Human Rights, Democracy and Peace".

↓ Authority Metrics: Score 67/100
↓ Global Reach of Pgaction
↓ Competitor Analysis for .ORG Domains
↓ Top Alternatives to pgaction.org

Tech Stack: Custom Built / Unknown
Link Profile: Internal Pages: 109Outbound Links: 45
Localization: en

6-Month Traffic Trend Estimate

Estimated Market Value

$487,200

Based on domain age, authority, and keyword relevance.

TLD Availability Risk

pgaction.comTaken
pgaction.netTaken
pgaction.orgAvailable
pgaction.ioAvailable
pgaction.coAvailable
pgaction.aiAvailable

Official Contact & Profiles

Socials:x.com x.com x.com x.com x.com

Screenshot or Official Image for pgaction.org - Parliamentarians for Global Action - Mobilizing Legislators as Champions for Human Rights, Democracy and a Sustainable World.

Visual representation extracted from pgaction.org

Content Snippets from pgaction.org

"Chad's withdrawal significantly undermines the considerable efforts undertaken by members of our organization to raise awareness of the Rome Statute system and promote its implementation at the national level."

"Opinion article by Hon. Mariam Solaimankhail, a Member of Parliament of Afghanistan in exile and a Member of Parliamentarians for Global Action. There is a girl in Logar Province who has completed sixth grade three times. Her father is a doctor, and she dreams of becoming one too. She is thirsty for education and loves everything about school — her books, her classmates, the routine of preparing for class, and the feeling of learning something she did not know the day before. However, under Taliban rule, she cannot continue to secondary school. Her father cannot bring himself to tell his daughter that her education is over, so he keeps sending her back to the last grade she is allowed to attend: sixth grade, again and again. She is becoming increasingly depressed. Her father can treat his patients, but he cannot provide his own daughter with the continued education she needs most. In 2017, as a member of Afghanistan's parliament, I was involved in the fight to pass legislation protecting children, defining when a child legally becomes an adult, and affirming a child's rights to an identity, education, and health care. A small group of men fought us fiercely. They invoked Sharia law and feared that recognizing these protections could restrict practices such as child marriage. They even threatened male parliamentarians who stood with us women supporting the law. We lobbied, we counted votes, alliances shifted, people argued passionately, and ultimately, the law passed. That was democracy. I remember other parliamentary sessions when two members strongly disagreed and would grow furious with each other. Hours later, I would see those same men drinking tea and laughing together. That was democracy. On 15 August 2021, when the Taliban returned to power, we lost the political space in which we were allowed to disagree. Today, we are left with an uncomfortable question: can there be true peace without freedom? If a girl cannot attend school, is that peace? If a woman cannot participate equally in her country, is that peace? If an Afghan fundamentally rejects Taliban rule but has no ballot through which to change it, no parliament through which to challenge it, and no meaningful political opposition through which to organize, what peaceful avenue remains? Peace cannot mean that one side was permitted to take power through the gun and everyone else must accept permanent political silence. We need meaningful participation, freedom of expression, rights for women, genuine political competition, and a peaceful mechanism by which Afghans themselves determine who governs them. Twenty years ago, girls had a path to meaningful participation in their country's future. They became doctors, judges, prosecutors, journalists, entrepreneurs, police officers, and parliamentarians. I was one of those women. We heard the many commitments made by the international community on democratic principles, women's rights, and gender equality. This included the Bonn Agreement in 2001, Afghanistan's ratification of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women in 2003, the Enduring Strategic Partnership Agreement with the U.S. in 2012, and the US-Afghanistan Bilateral Security Agreement in 2014. When democracy collapsed five years ago, the Taliban stripped away our rights and all commitments, systematically excluding Afghan women and girls. Female judges and prosecutors feared the people they helped convict. Journalists feared their reporting histories. Former soldiers feared retaliation. Women activists feared repercussions. Families fled, Afghans became refugees, and a generation of women and girls in Afghanistan is suffering. The girl in Logar is just one story of a girl waiting for peace. Her father fundamentally disagrees with the policy determining his daughter's future, but which representative can he lobby? Which candidate can he support? Which election can he use to say, "I want my daughter in school"? This is why democracy and women's rights in Afghanistan matter beyond Afghanistan. When the rights of half a nation can be erased overnight, we see how fragile freedom can become. The Taliban must be held accountable for their system of gender apartheid. Afghan political leaders must confront their mistakes, regional powers must answer for their interference, and the United States and its allies must take responsibility for their decisions and the commitments they left behind. Nobody should mistake the Taliban's monopoly on political power for the consent of the Afghan people. I remember another Afghanistan. It was loud with raucous shouting across the floor of parliament and bitter fights over legislation. Then came the vote, and sometimes, tea. The next morning, we could disagree again without returning to the battlefield. That was peace. That was democracy. Now, somewhere in Logar, a girl is still waiting for seventh grade."

Key Topics & Focus Areas for pgaction.org:

Authority Metrics: Score 67/100

Global Reach of Pgaction

Competitor Analysis for .ORG Domains

By comparing pgaction.org to other leading websites in its niche, marketers and researchers can identify key traffic sources and growth opportunities. Explore our related resources below to find websites similar to pgaction.org.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is pgaction.org a safe and secure website?

Yes, according to our latest analysis, we detected a valid SSL certificate ensuring a secure connection.

What is the authority score of pgaction.org?

As of September 5, 2026, pgaction.org holds an estimated domain authority score of 87/100 based on our VisitRank tracking algorithms.

What are the top alternatives to pgaction.org?

You can find the best alternatives and similar sites to pgaction.org in our explore section, which includes competitors in the News & Media sector.

Data Sources & Methodology: DNS telemetry and routing records are resolved via live root servers. Market valuation estimates are computed algorithmically based on proprietary historical indexation multiples and standardized digital asset appraisal methodologies.

Common Misspellings & Typo Domains for pgaction.org:

pagction.orgpgction.orgpggaction.orgpgection.orgpgactoon.orgpgaction.orgpfaction.orgptaction.org

Top Alternatives to pgaction.org

ekonomimedia.se abkikari.com hoanzl.at safetybrakeandclutch.com 18job.cc app.westminsterco.gov app.1919gogo.com pocarisweat.jp fukuda ss.co.jp carflexi.com sceneweekly.co.uk Home

"Parliamentarians for Global Action (PGA), in collaboration with its partners the Global Equality Caucus, the LGBTQ+ Victory Institute and the Council for Global Equality, supported the participation of legislators from 32 countries, from all regions, at WorldPride Amsterdam 2026. Board members from Seychelles, Zimbabwe and Belize shared insight on political leadership at the Human Rights Conference in Amsterdam then joined the full PGA Board for the Parliamentary Dialogue on Inclusion and Equality at the Senate of the Netherlands on 7 August. Political leadership on the conference stage PGA Board Member, Sen. Janelle Chanona (Belize), moderated the session, “Political Leadership in Parliament: legislative strategies to stop the global pushback against LGBTQIA+ rights, ” which explored the causes of the current political tide and actions leaders must take to protect LGBTQI+ people from further persecution. The panel brought together Lord Nick Herbert (UK House of Lords and Chair of the Global Equality Caucus), Deputy Minister Mmapaseka Steve Letsike (South Africa), Hon. Karen Makishima (House of Representatives, Japan), Rep. Mark Takano (House of Representatives, United States) and PGA Board member Hon. Bernard Georges, Leader of the Opposition in the Seychelles National Assembly. Steering a frank exchange on coalition-building, cross-party consensus and the most urgent priorities for safeguarding hard-won rights, Sen. Chanona drew out strategies from parliaments as different as Tokyo, Washington, Cape Town and Victoria, with Hon. Georges speaking directly to the realities of advancing inclusion in an African parliament. PGA Board member Hon. Daniel Molokele (Zimbabwe) joined representatives of the Global Fund, UNDP and the European Commission’s development directorate to examine how scaled-back aid commitments are undermining LGBTQI+ programming in education and public health, and what sustainable financing must look like for communities that can least afford the shortfall. Together, these discussions highlighted the role of parliamentarians from the Global South in shaping locally grounded responses to the global backlash against LGBTQI+ rights. Across the Human Rights Conference, PGA legislators heard a consistent message: that human rights are for everyone, everywhere, without exception, as Phyll Opoku-Gyimah emphasized – and that rights, once won, must also be defended. Speakers reminded participants that a lack of data leads to a lack of policy, a point underscored in multiple exchanges; and that SOGIESC issues must be reflected not only in equality legislation but in housing, health and every other realm of public policy. Legislators also took note of what institutions can deliver when political will exists. For example, the Council of Europe’s landmark Recommendation CM/Rec (2025)7 on Equal Rights for Intersex Persons, and the UN LGBTI Core Group’s model of states and civil society working together to advance visibility and rights through the UN system, as well as the impact of policies such as the US Global Gag Rule on organizations providing services to marginalized communities. PGA’s Board engages with legislators from around the world in the Dutch Senate PGA Board members participated in a Parliamentary Dialogue on Advancing the Rights of LGBTQI+ Persons, hosted at the Senate of the Netherlands by Senator Boris Dittrich, a longstanding PGA member and former member of its Executive Committee. More than 30 legislators from a wide range of political systems and starting points took part. Senator Dittrich set the tone with a deliberate challenge: to move beyond statements of principle and be concrete. He asked every participant to name what they are trying to achieve at home, perhaps a bill, a repeal, a policy change, a shift in enforcement, to identify the support they need and from whom. Hon. Christelle Vuanga, MP (Democratic Republic of the Congo), member of PGA’s Executive Committee, opened the substantive discussion with a personal account of how she came to this work. Confronted, soon after her election, with a wave of messages targeting her approach to concerns from LGBTQI+ people in her constituency, she asked herself two questions: What kind of elected representative would I be if I didn’t take my own constituents seriously? and Do I understand the facts about LGBTQI+ people in my constituency? Those questions led her to public broadcasts, sensitization and a clear-eyed reading of the DRC’s legal position (no explicit criminalization, but no marriage equality and no protection against discrimination) and to a commitment, as both parliamentarian and human rights defender, to strengthen health, justice and public services for those most exposed to violence and exclusion. Lord Collins of Highbury, the United Kingdom’s Special Envoy for LGBT+ Rights, and Senator Duncan Wilson (Canada) also shared remarks. The interactive exchange that followed did exactly what Senator Dittrich asked. Legislators laid out where they stand and what they need to make progress: a Botswana MP, who chairs the SADC Parliamentary Forum’s work on sexual and reproductive health rights, emphasized the importance of appreciating, internalizing and partnering with civil society; a Polish MP described the situation in a country that remains near the bottom of ILGA-Europe’s Rainbow Map ranking, where parliament passed a civil partnership bill only to see it vetoed by the president, the legacy of so-called ‘LGBT-free zones’ persist and EU support remains constant; a Spanish MP chairing the Human Rights Committee emphasized the need to link human rights, constitutional affairs and public health; Canada’s first openly gay MP of Asian descent spoke on the principle of leaving no one behind, and on the compounded discrimination for immigrant communities; a UK MP serving as the Council of Europe’s General Rapporteur on LGBTI rights discussed the importance of banning conversion practices and answering the free-speech objection – arguing that abusive practices cannot be justified by consent; and a German legislator spoke on religious fundamentalism, court rulings and the reality that thousands of queer people lack housing. Legislators put specific asks on the table – comparative legal analysis, technical drafting support, joint letters, public solidarity statements they can point to at home – and matched them with specific offers of help from colleagues who have fought, won, lost and learned from similar battles. Why it matters PGA’s participation in WorldPride moved from shared values to a shared agenda. The discussions produced a practical working map of legislative objectives, technical needs and timelines that PGA and its partners can now carry forward, so that parliamentarians facing difficult votes or legislative challenges can draw quickly and concretely on the experience and support of colleagues."

"Venezuela’s official withdrawal from the Rome Statute represents a serious setback for the fight against impunity and access to justice for victims and survivors. From Ratification to Withdrawal As the first Latin American country to ratify the Rome Statute on 7 June 2000, following its signature on 14 October 1998, Venezuela played a leading role in strengthening the ICC, paving the way for accountability in the region. In recent years, however, Venezuela’s engagement with international justice mechanisms has steadily declined, raising concerns about its commitment. In 2021, following the referral from a group of States Parties, the ICC opened an investigation into alleged crimes against humanity committed in Venezuela since April 2017. In parallel, under the principle of universal jurisdiction, a prosecutor in Argentina launched an investigation in July 2023 into crimes committed in Venezuela since 2014. Despite these initiatives, continued repression and ongoing crimes against humanity in the country have impeded meaningful progress toward justice. Insufficient complementarity efforts by Venezuelan authorities led to the closure of the ICC’s country office in 2025, and the National Assembly’s vote on 11 December 2025 to repeal ratification further undermined the pursuit of justice for victims and survivors. The recent withdrawal, submitted to the United Nations on 24 July 2026, marks a troubling regression. It occurs amid a wave of attacks and pressure on the Rome Statute system, including increased threats against the ICC and withdrawal announcements by Niger, Burkina Faso, and Mali in June 2026, and by Chad in July 2026, which risk weakening the Court’s effectiveness. Nevertheless, in accordance with the Rome Statute, Venezuela will remain a State Party until 24 July 2027. Under Article 127, until the withdrawal takes effect, the ICC retains jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute crimes committed on Venezuela’s territory or by its nationals, and the country remains bound by its legal obligations. Implications in the Region and Beyond The withdrawal by Venezuela is a dangerous precedent in our region with far-reaching consequences. The international justice system depends on the support and cooperation of all states. With each fracture in the framework, it becomes increasingly challenging to bring perpetrators of gross human rights violations to justice. The path forward must be one of renewed commitment, stronger cooperation, and principled leadership in support of justice for all. Dip. Jorge Calix, Member of Parliament of Honduras, Chairperson of the International Council of Parliamentarians for Global Action. At a time when the Rome Statute system is under intense pressure, states must strengthen support for the International Criminal Court and renew efforts to achieve universality. Parliamentarians and civil society actors must continue to uphold the integrity of the Court and the Rome Statute system. Recent examples from around the world, such as Hungary’s reversal of its planned withdrawal and the leadership shown by parliamentarians supporting the ICC, should be followed by sustained engagement to make a difference. Call to Parliamentarians We call on Members of the National Assembly in Venezuela to urge their government to revoke its withdrawal from the Rome Statute and reaffirm its commitment to international justice and cooperation with accountability mechanisms. We further call on parliamentarians around the world to protect the ICC, promote the universality of the Rome Statute, and stand with victims and survivors seeking justice and accountability. Venezuela's decision to withdraw from the International Criminal Court is a cause for grave concern. The victims of crimes against humanity in Venezuela must be at the heart of all efforts toward justice, reparations, convictions, and guarantees of non-repetition. The role of the ICC is essential when national courts lack independence and effectiveness. We urge progress in the Court's investigation and the application of the principle of universal jurisdiction in all Member States to ensure that victims and survivors are heard and that perpetrators are held accountable. Dip. Margarita Stolbizer, former member of the Argentine Chamber of Deputies and PGA Board Member"