Noise and Health🔒 SSL Verified

Live Data Status: Analyzed on August 9, 2026|E-commerce & Retail

Welcome to the detailed analysis for noiseandhealth.org. This domain is officially recognized as Noise and Health. According to their official web presence, their primary focus is: "Detailed SEO and authority metrics for noiseandhealth.org. Noiseandhealth currently holds an estimated domain authority score of 93/100 in the .ORG namespace based on our global index mapping.".

↓ Current Issue Highlights
↓ Latest Articles
↓ Most Popular Articles
↓ Featured Jobs
↓ Top Alternatives to noiseandhealth.org

Tech Stack: Next.jsReactCloudflare
Link Profile: Internal Pages: 7Outbound Links: 25
Localization: en

6-Month Traffic Trend Estimate

Estimated Market Value

$13,608

Based on domain age, authority, and keyword relevance.

TLD Availability Risk

noiseandhealth.comTaken
noiseandhealth.netTaken
noiseandhealth.orgTaken
noiseandhealth.ioTaken
noiseandhealth.coTaken
noiseandhealth.aiTaken

Screenshot or Official Image for noiseandhealth.org - Noise and Health

Visual representation extracted from noiseandhealth.org

Content Snippets from noiseandhealth.org

"Floor impact noise is a persistent environmental source of stress for people who live in multifamily housing and has both psychological and physiological effects. This commentary presents a synthesis of interdisciplinary findings that illustrate the inadequacy of regulatory frameworks in addressing the affective components of residents’ complaints about the noise. Regulatory frameworks rely solely on energy-based, single-number quantities; however, they inadequately capture the cognitive and emotional dimensions of impact noise exposure. Evidence reveals that conventional structural interventions address mid- and high-frequency attenuation, but low-frequency components of floor impact noise are primarily unmitigated. Physiological studies have also reported autonomic arousal and activation of the stress system, particularly among individuals who are sensitive to noise. Epidemiological evidence further indicates that noise sensitivity affects a substantial proportion of the general population and constitutes an independent risk factor for adverse health outcomes. Future noise criteria require psychoacoustically informed metrics that incorporate emotional valence and individual factors. Directions for future research include conducting longitudinal dose–response studies, cross-cultural validation, and transdisciplinary frameworks that incorporate the sociocultural, sensory, and ecological aspects of sustainable residential acoustic design."

"Objective: Over the past decade, the prevalence of hearing aid users in open-plan offices has risen significantly. This study investigates the potential effects of wearing hearing aids on cognitive performance and psychological state in noisy office environments. Methods: A laboratory experiment involved 46 normal-hearing participants. Four sound conditions mixed speech with open-plan office noise at varying signal-to-noise ratios. Stimuli were recorded in a semi-anechoic room using an acoustic dummy head with and without hearing aids, and moderate hearing loss was simulated. Participants performed a 1 h 40 min press review task over headphones. Performance, sound environment perception, fatigue and mental workload were assessed. Repeated-measures analyses of variance was performed to analyse the data. Results: The results revealed a significant principal effect of wearing hearing aids on each of the three dimensions of sound environment perception: noisy (F (1,44)=70.52, ***p < 0.001, ), annoying (F (1,44) = 58.40, ***p < 0.001, ) and tiring (F (1,44) = 34.44, ***p < 0.001, ). In all cases, the environment was perceived more poorly with hearing aids (e.g., mean annoyance = 4.4 vs. 2.7). A small but significant effect was also found on external mental workload (F (1,45) = 6.1 p* = 0.017, ). No significant effects were detected impacting task performance, perceived fatigue or other workload dimensions (available resources, germane workload). Conclusion: The findings suggest that, when activities require high levels of concentration, hearing aids may have a detrimental effect on the perception of the sound environment. However, the results highlight the need for collective prevention. Consequently, workspace acoustics should be optimised, regardless of hearing status."

Key Topics & Focus Areas for noiseandhealth.org:

Current Issue Highlights

Latest Articles

Featured Jobs

By comparing noiseandhealth.org to other leading websites in its niche, marketers and researchers can identify key traffic sources and growth opportunities. Explore our related resources below to find websites similar to noiseandhealth.org.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is noiseandhealth.org a safe and secure website?

Yes, according to our latest analysis, we detected a valid SSL certificate ensuring a secure connection.

What is the authority score of noiseandhealth.org?

As of August 9, 2026, noiseandhealth.org holds an estimated domain authority score of 63/100 based on our VisitRank tracking algorithms.

What are the top alternatives to noiseandhealth.org?

You can find the best alternatives and similar sites to noiseandhealth.org in our explore section, which includes competitors in the E-commerce & Retail sector.

Data Sources & Methodology: DNS telemetry and routing records are resolved via live root servers. Market valuation estimates are computed algorithmically based on proprietary historical indexation multiples and standardized digital asset appraisal methodologies.

Common Misspellings & Typo Domains for noiseandhealth.org:

nioseandhealth.orgnoseandhealth.orgnooiseandhealth.orgnoiseandhealth.orgnooseandhealth.orgnoisaandhealth.orgnoiseendhealth.orgnoiseandhaalth.orgnoiseandheelth.orgniiseandhealth.org

Top Alternatives to noiseandhealth.org

wukongtongyun.com msrfid.com cimalp.com construct.net gl pharma.com casinomodernmag.co.uk inselatorie.ro app.fditrpi.ru puertoalicante.com grandwagerworld.com www.holliewalker.uk Home

"Background: Aural morbidity remains an under-recognized public health concern in urban slum populations where environmental noise exposure, poor housing, and unsafe hygiene practices co-exist. Evidence on combined socio-environmental determinants of ear health in such settings remains limited. Methods: A community-based, stratified, cross-sectional study was conducted among 384 residents aged 10–50 years from six urban slums in Bhubaneswar, stratified into low-, medium-, and high-noise zones. Data were collected using a pre-tested semi-structured questionnaire, otoscopic examination, and tuning fork tests. Associations between socio-demographic, environmental, and behavioral factors with aural morbidity were analyzed using chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression. Results: Overall aural morbidity prevalence was 21.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 17.3–25.5), comprising infection only (11.2%), hearing loss only (2.6%), and combined morbidity (7.3%). Screening detected hearing loss prevalence increased across exposure gradients—low (2.4%), medium (11%), and high noise zones (15.6%) (P = 0.001). Unsafe ear cleaning (P = 0.017), prior infection (<0.001), ear piercing (P = 0.002), and lack of ear check-ups (P = 0.021) were significantly associated. High noise exposure independently predicted morbidity (AOR), i.e., adjusted odds ratio 8.52; 95% CI: 2.90–25.08). Housing factors, including insect presence, flooding, and unsafe water sources, also demonstrated significant associations. Conclusion: Aural morbidity in urban slums reflects intersecting environmental, behavioral, and socio-housing risks. Integrating ear and hearing care within National Health Mission (NHM) platforms and Comprehensive Primary Health Care (CPHC) services can advance progress toward Sustainable Development Goals SDG 3 (Health), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities), and SDG 6 (Sanitation) through multisectoral urban health interventions."

"Objective: This study aimed to examine the association between cumulative occupational noise exposure, using high-frequency hearing loss as an objective marker, and hypertension among Air Force ground staff. Methods: Active-duty Air Force ground staff (n = 451) completed standardized questionnaires and underwent pure-tone audiometry, and their blood pressure (BP) and laboratory profiles were measured. High-frequency hearing loss was defined as the average 4-kHz hearing threshold in both ears and was categorized into low (< 7.5 decibels [dB], 2nd quartile), medium (7.5–12.5 dB), and high (≥ 12.5 dB, 3rd quartile) groups. Hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥140 mmHg, diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥90 mmHg, or a previous diagnosis. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to estimate associations. Results: The prevalence of hypertension increased progressively across the hearing loss categories (40.9%, 63.5%, and 82.1%, respectively). Compared with the low group, the odds of hypertension were significantly higher in the medium (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–3.34) and high (aOR = 4.81, 95% CI: 2.51–9.02) groups. Each 5-dB increase in the 4-kHz hearing threshold was associated with double the likelihood of hypertension (aOR = 2.15, 95% CI: 1.57–2.94) and with increases in SBP and DBP (adjusted beta coefficients [aβ] = 0.63 and 0.46 mmHg, respectively). Conclusion: High-frequency hearing loss as a proxy for cumulative noise exposure was strongly associated with hypertension among the Air Force ground staff. These findings suggest that occupational noise may be associated with an increased risk of hypertension."