A Christian Manifesto🔒 SSL Verified

Table of Contents

• ↓ Reading Dugin Like a Berean
• ↓ Why Christians Should Test Controversial Thinkers, Not Fear Them
• ↓ So what does Waller get factually wrong?
• ↓ Your comments are welcome
• ↓ Suggested products
• ↓ Top Alternatives to forerunner.com

6-Month Traffic Trend Estimate

Official Contact & Profiles

Visual representation extracted from forerunner.com

Content Snippets from forerunner.com

"The Changing World Order series is my attempt to help Christians understand the great civilizational shift now taking place in the world. In the series, I examine Ray Dalio’s theory of economic and imperial Big Cycles, Samuel Huntington’s thesis on the Clash of Civilizations, and Aleksandr Dugin’s Fourth Political Theory – not to accept these thinkers uncritically, but to test their insights through Scripture, Christian civilization, and a Reformed biblical worldview. My goal is to show how Christians can understand the decline of Liberal Modernity, the rise of a multipolar world, and the opportunity before us to recover a truly Christian vision of culture, politics, and civilization."

"The reception and sales of the third volume, my book on Aleksandr Dugin, has surprised me. I knew from the beginning that Ray Dalio would be easier for readers to approach because his framework is practical, economic, and familiar. I knew Samuel Huntington would be easier to grasp because Christians already sense that the world is moving from ideological conflict toward civilizational conflict. But Dugin is different. He is controversial, foreign, philosophical, and almost always introduced to Americans through caricature. He is also difficult to understand unless you have a grasp on the history of Western philosophy including many recent esoteric and anti-Modernist thinkers. So the fact that this book is finding an audience tells me something important: thoughtful Christians are beginning to understand that the crisis of the West cannot be explained by ordinary left-right politics."

"I am not asking Christians to become Duginists. I am asking them to become discerning Bereans. That is why I welcome honest criticism of Dugin. Debate is healthy. Christians should not be afraid of difficult ideas, nor should we swallow any thinker whole simply because he attacks the same enemies we oppose. But we must also understand that articles about Dugin often come with an agenda. J. Michael Waller’s article on Dugin is not merely an academic review of Dugin’s philosophy. It is a warning piece written from a national-security perspective, aimed at convincing American traditionalists that Dugin is not just wrong, but spiritually and geopolitically dangerous. Waller frames Dugin as a false prophet whose “price” is “the end of the United States and Western civilization.”"

"There also appears to be a secondary purpose: to discredit Tucker Carlson by associating him with Dugin. The article does not begin with Dugin’s philosophy, but with the insinuation that Dugin is “Tucker Carlson’s” favorite philosopher. That framing does a great deal of work before the argument even begins. If Tucker is willing to interview or platform Dugin, then Tucker himself must be flirting with anti-American, pro-Russian, or pagan-imperial ideas. This is a common guilt-by-association tactic. Rather than first asking whether Tucker’s interview helped expose Americans to a censored or misunderstood thinker, the article uses Dugin as a weapon to discredit Tucker and, by extension, any American traditionalist who is willing to question the official Liberal-globalist consensus."

Key Topics & Focus Areas for forerunner.com:

Reading Dugin Like a Berean

Why Christians Should Test Controversial Thinkers, Not Fear Them

So what does Waller get factually wrong?

Your comments are welcome

Suggested products